Although I'm still reveling in the natural wonders encountered during my time in Oregon, it's important to remember that while I was having fun, others have been experiencing the power of nature in a very different way. The catastrophic effects of some severe climactic and geological events recently have left many suffering. The tsunami in Japan, the flooding along the Mississippi, and a rash of tornadoes across the southeastern U.S. present sobering reminders that nature can be as destructive as she is beautiful.
Images of devastation and suffering have not been lacking. We have seen houses flattened and submerged, cars and trucks carried along in floodwaters like toys, and people young and old surveying their losses with looks of forlorn desperation.
This link provides a very different perspective on the devastation. It shows the path of the April 27 tornado that tore across Tuscaloosa, Alabama from space. It left a path wider than nearby rivers and freeways, and gives a whole new perspective on the force nature can exert upon the landscape and its inhabitants.
Tuesday, May 24, 2011
Sunday, May 22, 2011
Mmmm, beer.
I just returned from a fantastic vacation to Oregon, one that should provide fodder for a few posts following this one. Not only did the Beaver State present all sorts of natural wonders to write about, but I also spent a few days with a friend who is a very successful writer. Just being around him tends to inspire me to put pen to paper (or finger to keyboard, at least). That combination caused me to shake Running On awake from its most recent slumber...
Of course, in addition to letting me spend time with friends and letting me experience some spectacular places, Oregon also introduced me to some outstanding craft beers. I have to admit, the state's self-proclaimed status as micro-brew capital of the U.S. seems to be warranted. A particular favorite, due in part to their beer and in part to a fun bartender and tasty ribeye, was Golden Valley Brewery in McMinnville. Also, its waterfront location in Newport, overwhelming diversity of brews, and the rich smell of yeast permeating the air made the Rogue Brewery a memorable spot as well.
Quite serendipitously, upon returning to the Bay State, I came across an interesting article on the state of craft brews generally and organic brews specifically in the U.S. And it seems that things look good! Craft brews account for around 5% of U.S. beer sales by volume and 7.6% by value (given the higher price point). Both figures represent continued growth, with analysts predicting that sales could reach 20% over the next decade.
Within that market, organic brews still represent a small fraction of the 1,716 craft brews in the country. However, sales of organic brews increased nearly fivefold from 2003 to 2009, from $9 million to $41 million. That is the fastest growth of any sector of the U.S. beer market.
And, fittingly, to close our time in Oregon (for now) we had our last beer at the PDX location of the organic Laurelwood Brewery!
Of course, in addition to letting me spend time with friends and letting me experience some spectacular places, Oregon also introduced me to some outstanding craft beers. I have to admit, the state's self-proclaimed status as micro-brew capital of the U.S. seems to be warranted. A particular favorite, due in part to their beer and in part to a fun bartender and tasty ribeye, was Golden Valley Brewery in McMinnville. Also, its waterfront location in Newport, overwhelming diversity of brews, and the rich smell of yeast permeating the air made the Rogue Brewery a memorable spot as well.
Quite serendipitously, upon returning to the Bay State, I came across an interesting article on the state of craft brews generally and organic brews specifically in the U.S. And it seems that things look good! Craft brews account for around 5% of U.S. beer sales by volume and 7.6% by value (given the higher price point). Both figures represent continued growth, with analysts predicting that sales could reach 20% over the next decade.
Within that market, organic brews still represent a small fraction of the 1,716 craft brews in the country. However, sales of organic brews increased nearly fivefold from 2003 to 2009, from $9 million to $41 million. That is the fastest growth of any sector of the U.S. beer market.
And, fittingly, to close our time in Oregon (for now) we had our last beer at the PDX location of the organic Laurelwood Brewery!
Wednesday, January 26, 2011
New discoveries!
I signed off in 2010 by sharing the very welcome discovery of a nesting pair of Harpy eagles in the mountains of believe. Not to be outdone, 2011 has kicked off with reports of some exciting discoveries of its own:
Firstly, a previously unknown area of healthy, pristine coral reef has been discovered in deep waters (at least as far as reefs are concerned, i.e., 100-500 feet) off the southwest corner of Puerto Rico. Often, reefs in deeper waters are more low-relief and generally less topographically complex than those in shallow waters. That means they often support lower diversity and abundance than shallow reefs.
But it does not mean they are less ecologically important. Deepwater reefs can be home to very different species than shallow reefs, so they harbor unique biodiversity. For those species held in common between deep and shallow reefs, the deeper habitat can serve as a refuge to buffer the population against natural or anthropogenic impacts, such as storms and fishing, which typically have more severe impacts in shallower water. Also, low-relief deepwater reef habitat can serve to link larger and more complex shallow habitat areas as a sort of underwater highway, or at least as a series of stepping stones across open and unsheltered bottom (for a stimulating discussion of this function, see this fine volume).
Of course, the couple of photos provided in the article on the discovery of these reefs linked above suggest that these might be more complex and higher relief reefs than one might expect in deep water. Sure, 100-500 feet is really not that deep in comparison with some truly deepwater corals (i.e., 400-2000 meters, not feet!), so we might be looking at something more akin to shallow reefs than deep.
In any case, there are many exciting scientific questions waiting to be addressed concerning the species composition and ecological function of these reefs, both in their own right and in relation to other nearby shallower reefs. Perhaps more importantly, hopefully we will implement quick and aggressive conservation measures for these reefs to get ahead of the curve and ensure that we do not lose their lessons and value before they can be understood…
A second discovery is that of a new and very unique species of freshwater crayfish in the streams of Tennessee. It’s also a very large crayfish, and interestingly has oddly “bearded” antennae. Reports of this discovery note that, while finding new species in remote jungles of Borneo or in the depths of the ocean is neither uncommon nor entirely unexpected, finding new species in very accessible streams of a highly populated and developed nation like the U.S. is unusual. I agree – that’s pretty cool. Like the newly discovered Puerto Rican reefs, this species lives in deeper parts of streams, and also seems to be in fairly low abundance, which together perhaps explain why it has escaped out attention. And, like those new reefs, hopefully we will act quickly to understand and protect this newly discovered beast…
Finally, a personal new discovery, albeit one long known to science: I’ve been working my way through the BBC’s excellent “Life” series (the follow-up to its celebrated “Planet Earth”). In the “Fish” episode, I was introduced to the – and I still cannot believe this name – Sarcastic Fringehead, which lives in water off the U.S. Pacific coast. In many ways, this fish seems to be a Pacific version of one of my favorite Atlantic species, the oyster toadfish. Both live in patches of structured habitat amidst areas of open sand, and both are ambush predators and aggressively territorial.
But where the fringehead – and it pains me to say this – perhaps proves the superior species is its amazing territorial contests, which cannot be adequately described and really need to be seen. Of course, toadfish exhibit some impressive vocalizations, and I’m not sure whether fringeheads do or not, so maybe the determining factor is whether one has more of an audio or visual inclination? Or, maybe both species should just be appreciated for their undeniable coolness and not ranked?
In any case, 2011 has presented some fascinating discoveries so far, and hopefully will continue to provide many more!
Firstly, a previously unknown area of healthy, pristine coral reef has been discovered in deep waters (at least as far as reefs are concerned, i.e., 100-500 feet) off the southwest corner of Puerto Rico. Often, reefs in deeper waters are more low-relief and generally less topographically complex than those in shallow waters. That means they often support lower diversity and abundance than shallow reefs.
But it does not mean they are less ecologically important. Deepwater reefs can be home to very different species than shallow reefs, so they harbor unique biodiversity. For those species held in common between deep and shallow reefs, the deeper habitat can serve as a refuge to buffer the population against natural or anthropogenic impacts, such as storms and fishing, which typically have more severe impacts in shallower water. Also, low-relief deepwater reef habitat can serve to link larger and more complex shallow habitat areas as a sort of underwater highway, or at least as a series of stepping stones across open and unsheltered bottom (for a stimulating discussion of this function, see this fine volume).
Of course, the couple of photos provided in the article on the discovery of these reefs linked above suggest that these might be more complex and higher relief reefs than one might expect in deep water. Sure, 100-500 feet is really not that deep in comparison with some truly deepwater corals (i.e., 400-2000 meters, not feet!), so we might be looking at something more akin to shallow reefs than deep.
In any case, there are many exciting scientific questions waiting to be addressed concerning the species composition and ecological function of these reefs, both in their own right and in relation to other nearby shallower reefs. Perhaps more importantly, hopefully we will implement quick and aggressive conservation measures for these reefs to get ahead of the curve and ensure that we do not lose their lessons and value before they can be understood…
A second discovery is that of a new and very unique species of freshwater crayfish in the streams of Tennessee. It’s also a very large crayfish, and interestingly has oddly “bearded” antennae. Reports of this discovery note that, while finding new species in remote jungles of Borneo or in the depths of the ocean is neither uncommon nor entirely unexpected, finding new species in very accessible streams of a highly populated and developed nation like the U.S. is unusual. I agree – that’s pretty cool. Like the newly discovered Puerto Rican reefs, this species lives in deeper parts of streams, and also seems to be in fairly low abundance, which together perhaps explain why it has escaped out attention. And, like those new reefs, hopefully we will act quickly to understand and protect this newly discovered beast…
Finally, a personal new discovery, albeit one long known to science: I’ve been working my way through the BBC’s excellent “Life” series (the follow-up to its celebrated “Planet Earth”). In the “Fish” episode, I was introduced to the – and I still cannot believe this name – Sarcastic Fringehead, which lives in water off the U.S. Pacific coast. In many ways, this fish seems to be a Pacific version of one of my favorite Atlantic species, the oyster toadfish. Both live in patches of structured habitat amidst areas of open sand, and both are ambush predators and aggressively territorial.
But where the fringehead – and it pains me to say this – perhaps proves the superior species is its amazing territorial contests, which cannot be adequately described and really need to be seen. Of course, toadfish exhibit some impressive vocalizations, and I’m not sure whether fringeheads do or not, so maybe the determining factor is whether one has more of an audio or visual inclination? Or, maybe both species should just be appreciated for their undeniable coolness and not ranked?
In any case, 2011 has presented some fascinating discoveries so far, and hopefully will continue to provide many more!
Friday, December 31, 2010
Countdown to 2011, Part III: Harpies!
Finally, to send 2010 off into the history books, I was absolutely tickled to see this report about the discovery of an active nest of Harpy Eagles in the mountains of Belize! This pair is raising chick in an area where Harpies were recently thought to be extinct, a full 700 miles north of the what we thought was the extent of their range. The Harpy Eagle is high on the list of animals I most want to see in the wild at some point in my lifetime (joining the Great White Shark, Komodo Dragon, Nile Crocodile, African Elephant, Kodiak Bear, and Mandarinfish among others), and knowing there is one more place where that might be possible is encouraging.
Indeed, any report of species showing recovery, resilience and adaptability gives me hope and encouragement. To be sure, the Belizeans are owed credit for protecting tracts of good habitat in which the Harpies could re-establish. But the birds themselves deserve the most credit for their perseverance, not to mention my personal thanks for sending me into 2011 on a positive note!
Indeed, any report of species showing recovery, resilience and adaptability gives me hope and encouragement. To be sure, the Belizeans are owed credit for protecting tracts of good habitat in which the Harpies could re-establish. But the birds themselves deserve the most credit for their perseverance, not to mention my personal thanks for sending me into 2011 on a positive note!
Countdown to 2011, Part II: Numbers
Although I find my thinking as a scientist, not to mention my work, has evolved over the past 5-7 years away from original training and interest in population biology much more toward the more complex arena of ecosystem ecology. That evolution began when I began to work on watershed and habitat issues, stepping beyond the single-species demographic studies that had dominated my doctoral and post-doctoral work. More recently, I find my interests moving further still toward the concept of social-ecological systems, which essentially means truly integrating the full complexity of the human species into ecosystem science. It's an exciting, albeit somewhat overwhelming, area, about which I have much to learn.
Still, I think there is still an important place for the more focused study of populations of individual species in their own right. From an applied point of view, single-species population biology will establish the conservation and management backstops guiding action when we find a species in dire straits, or is the species is sufficiently important (most likely economically, but perhaps culturally or ecologically as well) to warrant more focused attention. Moving toward ecosystem science and management involves trade-offs in what we factor into our understanding and decision-making. Specifically, we will generally pay less attention to the intricacies of individual species' biology, but factors in more of the external factors that also drive their dynamics yet are largely ignored by classical population biology. But population biology will be where we turn when a species needs special attention.
Also, in terms of my own personal satisfaction from scientific study, I find in-depth examination of population biology to be more gratifying because it allows one to know a species in a way that is almost intimate, uncovering the uniqueness and complexity that shape its numbers and place in the world. The study of populations is heavily grounded in numbers (growth and mortality rates, abundance and density, age and size structure), but taken together those numbers become something more, a whole greater than the sum of its parts. When I think about an area of the ocean from an ecosystem perspective, I consider a wide array of species interacting in that space. But each is somewhat anonymous, and I feel special affinity for those species I have studied in more depth (notably, the stripey bass that was the focus of my doctoral dissertation, and to a growing extent the humble alewife that inspired the name of this blog).
In any case, I have entered into this discussion of populations because two milestones in the population of our own humble species are at hand. Firstly, the U.S. Census Bureau recently released the results of the 2010 Census, announcing to the world that there are now 308,745,538 Americans. Frankly, that number seems low to me. For some reason, I thought we were up above the 350,000,000 mark.
Regardless, it's tough to know exactly what that number really means. Probably very little. What is more important is how that population is structured and distributed, not to mention how its members interact with one another and the world around us. In the coming weeks, I'll be poking around that site more deeply to see what interesting patterns lie in the data. And I won't be alone. Census data form the cornerstone of any number of analyses by government agencies from the local to federal level, non-governmental organizations, academicians and corporations (marketing...). Indeed, my guess is that the decadal U.S. census is the most widely used database in the world.
The second milestone is our global approach toward 7 billion people. Whoa. That number and scale is a bit too daunting to say much more about right now, but National Geographic has done an interesting exploration of its significance that is well worth checking out.
So many numbers, so little time!
Still, I think there is still an important place for the more focused study of populations of individual species in their own right. From an applied point of view, single-species population biology will establish the conservation and management backstops guiding action when we find a species in dire straits, or is the species is sufficiently important (most likely economically, but perhaps culturally or ecologically as well) to warrant more focused attention. Moving toward ecosystem science and management involves trade-offs in what we factor into our understanding and decision-making. Specifically, we will generally pay less attention to the intricacies of individual species' biology, but factors in more of the external factors that also drive their dynamics yet are largely ignored by classical population biology. But population biology will be where we turn when a species needs special attention.
Also, in terms of my own personal satisfaction from scientific study, I find in-depth examination of population biology to be more gratifying because it allows one to know a species in a way that is almost intimate, uncovering the uniqueness and complexity that shape its numbers and place in the world. The study of populations is heavily grounded in numbers (growth and mortality rates, abundance and density, age and size structure), but taken together those numbers become something more, a whole greater than the sum of its parts. When I think about an area of the ocean from an ecosystem perspective, I consider a wide array of species interacting in that space. But each is somewhat anonymous, and I feel special affinity for those species I have studied in more depth (notably, the stripey bass that was the focus of my doctoral dissertation, and to a growing extent the humble alewife that inspired the name of this blog).
In any case, I have entered into this discussion of populations because two milestones in the population of our own humble species are at hand. Firstly, the U.S. Census Bureau recently released the results of the 2010 Census, announcing to the world that there are now 308,745,538 Americans. Frankly, that number seems low to me. For some reason, I thought we were up above the 350,000,000 mark.
Regardless, it's tough to know exactly what that number really means. Probably very little. What is more important is how that population is structured and distributed, not to mention how its members interact with one another and the world around us. In the coming weeks, I'll be poking around that site more deeply to see what interesting patterns lie in the data. And I won't be alone. Census data form the cornerstone of any number of analyses by government agencies from the local to federal level, non-governmental organizations, academicians and corporations (marketing...). Indeed, my guess is that the decadal U.S. census is the most widely used database in the world.
The second milestone is our global approach toward 7 billion people. Whoa. That number and scale is a bit too daunting to say much more about right now, but National Geographic has done an interesting exploration of its significance that is well worth checking out.
So many numbers, so little time!
Countdown to 2011, Part I: Jumo?
Well, I set a goal back in November of publishing more posts in 2010 than the whopping 4 that went live in 2009. Today, I woke up to find the final day of 2010 upon us and my yearly total sitting at an underwhelming 2. D'oh! Looks like I have some work to do, and fast. Brace thee for a fast and furious barrage of thought-provoking nuggets, all of which will be teasers for themes to be developed more extensively in the New Year...
Let's start with this story that caught my eye a month ago. It describes the launch of "Jumo", a new social media site focused on social change. I was intrigued by this site for two reasons. The first is my general exploration of the potential and limitations of social media in general. As I posted not long ago, I recently (and somewhat hesitantly, not to mention almost inexplicably) began some low-key dabbling in the word of Twitter (a place I once swore I would never venture...). Of course, I also shared Malcolm Gladwell's poignant piece from The New Yorker on the limits of social media in really changing the world. It will be interesting to see how far Jumo can push the envelope, although I can't see any way that Galdwell's central premise will be disproven by the new site. Action will always ultimately require standing up from the keyboard, walking out the door, and engaging the world...
My second interest lies in the potential for Jumo to help my goal of keeping Facebook personal. I rather like Facebook. But I want it to be something fun, and something first and foremost about re-connecting and keeping up to date with family and friends, and not something for work, politics, and other less light-hearted matters. Sure, I've been know to post a status update addressing matters of policy, etc., not to mention commenting when others do the same. And I do show support for various organizations and such through my page, although most of those are groups that friends work for and my support is more for the person than the organization. However, I've avoided any sort of social, political, or other less personal action through Facebook, but might get more active in those arenas through Jumo.
So far, I've gone to the site, looked at the home page...and done nothing more. Early in the New Year, I plan to set up an account, poke around a bit, and report back to the RO faithful with my take on the site. Stay tuned!
Let's start with this story that caught my eye a month ago. It describes the launch of "Jumo", a new social media site focused on social change. I was intrigued by this site for two reasons. The first is my general exploration of the potential and limitations of social media in general. As I posted not long ago, I recently (and somewhat hesitantly, not to mention almost inexplicably) began some low-key dabbling in the word of Twitter (a place I once swore I would never venture...). Of course, I also shared Malcolm Gladwell's poignant piece from The New Yorker on the limits of social media in really changing the world. It will be interesting to see how far Jumo can push the envelope, although I can't see any way that Galdwell's central premise will be disproven by the new site. Action will always ultimately require standing up from the keyboard, walking out the door, and engaging the world...
My second interest lies in the potential for Jumo to help my goal of keeping Facebook personal. I rather like Facebook. But I want it to be something fun, and something first and foremost about re-connecting and keeping up to date with family and friends, and not something for work, politics, and other less light-hearted matters. Sure, I've been know to post a status update addressing matters of policy, etc., not to mention commenting when others do the same. And I do show support for various organizations and such through my page, although most of those are groups that friends work for and my support is more for the person than the organization. However, I've avoided any sort of social, political, or other less personal action through Facebook, but might get more active in those arenas through Jumo.
So far, I've gone to the site, looked at the home page...and done nothing more. Early in the New Year, I plan to set up an account, poke around a bit, and report back to the RO faithful with my take on the site. Stay tuned!
Sunday, December 19, 2010
The right alignment
So we know that the sun, earth and moon will in the right alignment in the wee hours of Tuesday morning to produce a lunar eclipse. As a scientist, I always take notice when the night sky will provide us with an eclipse, meteor shower, comet, or other astronomical phenomenon. Of course, "take notice" doesn't necessarily mean "actually get out of bed and watch". After all, the heavens have an annoying tendency to showcase their wonders at an incredibly inconvenient hour. This week's eclipse, for example, will begin around 1:33AM EST, will reach totality at 2:41AM, and last for 72 minutes thereafter, with the deepest shadow at 3:17AM. My primary scientific interest lie in the forests, deserts, lakes, streams, and especially the oceans. For all of its vastness and mystery, the cosmos is at best a peripheral interest, and generally one that is not strong enough to lure from a warm bed at a late hour on a cold night...
However, the good people as NASA have provided a particularly compelling description of what the moon and the landscape it illuminates at night will look like during this eclipse (the link is also the source of the eclipse timeline recounted above). And I have to say it sounds pretty cool! The deep amber color that overtakes the moon and bathes the land has given the nickname "blood moon" to a lunar eclipse, and the phenomenon has given rise to numerous myths and legends across the globe, and at least one instance of cross-cultural deception.
With so much rare beauty possible, and so much science, history and legend tied to the event, I foresee setting my alarm to 2:45AM or so before bed on Monday night. Of course, there is one other alignment that will be an important determinant of whether my sleep is interrupted or not: the weather. Snow showers are forecasted for Monday night and Tuesday morning amidst cloudy skies. If those come and go before the eclipse, the land might be covered in a new white blanket ready to absorb the red hues. Or, the whole shebang could be obscured from view by clouds and flurries. It seems that some very subtle differences in weather patterns could be the difference between a rare night outside and a good night's sleep...
However, the good people as NASA have provided a particularly compelling description of what the moon and the landscape it illuminates at night will look like during this eclipse (the link is also the source of the eclipse timeline recounted above). And I have to say it sounds pretty cool! The deep amber color that overtakes the moon and bathes the land has given the nickname "blood moon" to a lunar eclipse, and the phenomenon has given rise to numerous myths and legends across the globe, and at least one instance of cross-cultural deception.
With so much rare beauty possible, and so much science, history and legend tied to the event, I foresee setting my alarm to 2:45AM or so before bed on Monday night. Of course, there is one other alignment that will be an important determinant of whether my sleep is interrupted or not: the weather. Snow showers are forecasted for Monday night and Tuesday morning amidst cloudy skies. If those come and go before the eclipse, the land might be covered in a new white blanket ready to absorb the red hues. Or, the whole shebang could be obscured from view by clouds and flurries. It seems that some very subtle differences in weather patterns could be the difference between a rare night outside and a good night's sleep...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)